Timezone API Comparison

Compare the best timezone and timestamp APIs for your application. Find the right balance of features, pricing, and reliability for your use case.

Quick Comparison

At-a-glance comparison of the most popular time and timezone APIs. All APIs listed provide JSON responses unless otherwise noted.

APIFree TierBest ForRating
World Time APIUnlimited (no rate limits listed)Simple current time lookups, development, and prototyping★★★★
TimeAPI.io100 requests/dayProduction applications requiring time calculations and business logic★★★★★
Abstract Time API200 requests/monthApps needing timezone data with IP geolocation★★★★
ipstack + TimeZoneDB10,000 requests/month (ipstack)Combining IP geolocation with timezone data★★★★
Google Maps Time Zone API$200 free credit per monthApplications already using Google Cloud Platform★★★★
Azure Maps Time Zone APILimited free tierEnterprise apps on Azure infrastructure★★★★
NTP Servers (Network Time Protocol)Completely freeSystem time synchronization, IoT devices, servers★★★★★

Feature Matrix

Compare features across major timezone APIs. Check marks indicate full support, crosses indicate the feature is not available.

FeatureTimeAPI.ioWorld TimeAbstractGoogleAzureNTP
Current Time
Timezone List
Timezone Conversion
IP Geolocation
Business Days
Time Calculations
No Auth Required
SLA Available

Pricing Comparison

Cost analysis for timezone APIs. Prices are approximate and subject to change. Check provider websites for current pricing.

ServiceFree TierPaid Starts AtBest ValueCost per 10K
World Time APIUnlimited (fair use)N/AFree tier$0
TimeAPI.io100/day (~3,000/month)$9/month10,000 requests$9
Abstract API200/month$9/month20,000 requests$4.50
Google Time Zone$200 credit (~40,000 req)$5/1,000 after creditHigh-volume$50 (after free credit)
Azure Maps Time ZoneLimitedUsage-basedEnterpriseVaries
NTP ServersUnlimitedN/ASystem sync$0

Note: Pricing is approximate and based on October 2025 data. Google and Azure pricing varies significantly based on usage and cloud credits. Always check provider websites for current rates.

Detailed API Reviews

In-depth analysis of each timezone API, including features, pros, cons, and best use cases.

World Time API ★★★★

Provider: Open Source Community

Best for: Simple current time lookups, development, and prototyping

Pricing

Free: Unlimited (no rate limits listed)

Technical

Auth: None required

Rate Limit: No official limit (fair use)

Format: JSON

Key Endpoints

  • GET /api/timezone/:area/:location
  • GET /api/ip
  • GET /api/timezone

Pros

  • Completely free
  • No authentication required
  • Simple API
  • Good documentation
  • IP-based timezone detection

Cons

  • No SLA or support
  • No advanced features
  • Uncertain long-term availability
  • No time calculations

Limitations: No SLA, no advanced features, no support

View Documentation →

TimeAPI.io ★★★★★

Provider: TimeAPI Ltd.

Best for: Production applications requiring time calculations and business logic

Pricing

Free: 100 requests/day

Paid: From $9/month for 10,000 requests

Technical

Auth: API key required

Rate Limit: Tier-based

Format: JSON

Key Endpoints

  • GET /api/Time/current/zone
  • GET /api/Time/current/ip
  • GET /api/TimeZone/AvailableTimeZones
  • POST /api/Conversion/ConvertTimeZone
  • POST /api/Calculation/Addition
  • POST /api/Calculation/Subtraction

Pros

  • Comprehensive feature set
  • Business day calculations
  • Excellent documentation
  • 99.9% SLA on paid plans
  • Active support

Cons

  • Requires payment for production use
  • API key management overhead
  • Rate limits can be restrictive
  • External dependency

Limitations: Costs money for meaningful usage, rate limits on free tier

View Documentation →

Abstract Time API ★★★★

Provider: Abstract API

Best for: Apps needing timezone data with IP geolocation

Pricing

Free: 200 requests/month

Paid: From $9/month for 20,000 requests

Technical

Auth: API key required

Rate Limit: Tier-based

Format: JSON

Key Endpoints

  • GET /timezone/current
  • GET /timezone/convert

Pros

  • Simple API
  • Reliable uptime
  • Good documentation
  • IP-based timezone detection
  • Part of larger API suite

Cons

  • Very limited free tier
  • No advanced calculations
  • More expensive than competitors
  • Requires multiple APIs for full suite

Limitations: Limited free tier, no business day logic

View Documentation →

ipstack + TimeZoneDB ★★★★

Provider: ipstack / TimeZoneDB

Best for: Combining IP geolocation with timezone data

Pricing

Free: 10,000 requests/month (ipstack)

Paid: From $10/month

Technical

Auth: API key required

Rate Limit: Tier-based

Format: JSON/XML

Key Endpoints

  • GET /timezone (TimeZoneDB)
  • GET /{ip} (ipstack for geolocation)

Pros

  • Good free tier
  • Reliable uptime
  • Multiple response formats
  • Comprehensive IP data

Cons

  • Requires two services
  • Complex pricing
  • No built-in calculations
  • Limited timezone features

Limitations: Requires two separate services for full functionality

View Documentation →

Google Maps Time Zone API ★★★★

Provider: Google Cloud

Best for: Applications already using Google Cloud Platform

Pricing

Free: $200 free credit per month

Paid: $5 per 1,000 requests after free credit

Technical

Auth: API key required

Rate Limit: Based on billing

Format: JSON

Key Endpoints

  • GET /timezone/json

Pros

  • Google reliability
  • Good free tier
  • Excellent documentation
  • Integration with other Google services

Cons

  • Requires lat/lng coordinates
  • Google Cloud complexity
  • No current time endpoint
  • Overkill for simple use cases

Limitations: Requires coordinates, limited to timezone lookups, Google Cloud setup

View Documentation →

Azure Maps Time Zone API ★★★★

Provider: Microsoft Azure

Best for: Enterprise apps on Azure infrastructure

Pricing

Free: Limited free tier

Paid: Pay-as-you-go pricing

Technical

Auth: Subscription key required

Rate Limit: Based on tier

Format: JSON

Key Endpoints

  • GET /timezone/byCoordinates
  • GET /timezone/byId
  • GET /timezone/enumIana

Pros

  • Enterprise-grade reliability
  • Comprehensive IANA support
  • Integration with Azure ecosystem
  • Strong SLA

Cons

  • Azure setup complexity
  • No current time endpoint
  • Requires coordinates
  • Pricing can be complex

Limitations: Azure complexity, requires coordinates or timezone ID

View Documentation →

NTP Servers (Network Time Protocol) ★★★★★

Provider: NTP Pool Project

Best for: System time synchronization, IoT devices, servers

Pricing

Free: Completely free

Technical

Auth: None

Rate Limit: Fair use policy

Format: NTP Protocol

Pros

  • Industry standard
  • Extremely accurate
  • Free and open
  • Distributed globally
  • Built into most operating systems

Cons

  • Not a REST API
  • Requires NTP client library
  • No timezone information
  • No business logic

Limitations: Protocol-level (not HTTP REST), timezone agnostic (UTC only)

View Documentation →

Use Case Recommendations

Which API should you choose? Here are recommendations based on common scenarios.

Hobby project / MVP

Recommended: World Time API

Why: Free, no authentication, good enough for low-traffic projects

Alternatives: TimeAPI.io free tier, NTP for server time

Production SaaS application

Recommended: TimeAPI.io

Why: SLA, support, comprehensive features, reasonable pricing

Alternatives: Abstract API, Google Time Zone if on GCP

Enterprise application

Recommended: Azure Maps Time Zone or Google Time Zone

Why: Enterprise SLA, compliance, integration with cloud infrastructure

Alternatives: TimeAPI.io, Self-hosted NTP + timezone library

Embedded systems / IoT

Recommended: NTP Servers

Why: Low bandwidth, accurate system time, industry standard

Alternatives: World Time API for timezone data, Offline timezone library

Mobile app with location features

Recommended: Abstract API or TimeAPI.io

Why: IP geolocation + timezone in one call

Alternatives: Google Time Zone with coordinates, Device timezone + validation

Financial / trading system

Recommended: NTP + local timezone library

Why: Microsecond accuracy, no external API dependency

Alternatives: TimeAPI.io as backup, PTP (Precision Time Protocol)

E-commerce / booking platform

Recommended: TimeAPI.io

Why: Business day calculations, timezone conversion, reliable SLA

Alternatives: Google Time Zone, Client-side library + server validation

Analytics / logging pipeline

Recommended: NTP for timestamps + local timezone library

Why: Minimize external dependencies, consistent timestamps

Alternatives: World Time API for validation, UTC everywhere approach

How to Choose the Right API

Decision Framework

  1. Determine Your Requirements
    • What features do you need? (current time, conversion, calculations)
    • What's your expected traffic? (requests per day/month)
    • Do you need an SLA?
    • What's your budget?
  2. Consider Your Infrastructure
    • Already on AWS/GCP/Azure? Use their timezone APIs
    • On-premises? Consider NTP + local timezone library
    • Serverless? Any REST API works well
  3. Evaluate Costs
    • Free tier sufficient? World Time API
    • Low-medium traffic? TimeAPI.io or Abstract API
    • High traffic? Consider self-hosting or negotiating volume pricing
  4. Test Before Committing
    • Try free tiers before paying
    • Check response times from your region
    • Verify data accuracy
    • Test error handling

Red Flags to Avoid

  • APIs without documentation
  • Services without clear pricing
  • Providers without uptime guarantees
  • APIs that don't use IANA timezone database
  • Services without HTTPS

Alternative: Client-Side Libraries

For many use cases, you don't need an external API at all. Consider using client-side JavaScript libraries like Luxon or date-fns combined with system time for timezone conversions. This approach:

  • Eliminates API costs and rate limits
  • Reduces latency (no network calls)
  • Works offline
  • Removes external dependencies

Only use timezone APIs when you specifically need server-side time synchronization, IP-based geolocation, or features not available in libraries.

Additional Resources

Disclosure: All external links include UTM parameters for analytics. We receive no affiliate commissions from any services listed. This comparison is based on publicly available information and our own testing.

Last updated: October 2025 | About Us | Privacy Policy