Ultimate List of Timestamp Tools for Developers
Comprehensive comparison of timestamp conversion tools, epoch converters, and datetime libraries. Find the right tool for your Unix time conversion, ISO 8601 formatting, and timezone handling needs.
Quick Comparison Table
At-a-glance comparison of popular timestamp tools across key features. All tools listed are actively maintained unless otherwise noted.
Tool | Timezone Support | Output Formats | Batch Processing | Privacy | Cost |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Timestamp Generator | Full IANA | Unix (s/ms), ISO 8601, Human | No | Client-side only | Free |
EpochConverter.com | Basic | Unix, ISO, RFC 2822 | Yes | Server-side | Free (ads) |
Luxon | Full IANA | Customizable | Programmatic | Client-side | Free (OSS) |
Day.js | Plugin | Customizable | Programmatic | Client-side | Free (OSS) |
World Time API | Full IANA | JSON | Via API | Server-side | Free |
TimeAPI.io | Full IANA | JSON | Via API | Server-side | Free tier + Paid |
Web-Based Timestamp Tools
Browser-based tools for quick conversions without installation. Best for one-off conversions, debugging, and learning timestamp concepts.
Timestamp Generator ★★★★★
Best for: Engineers who need accurate timezone-aware conversions with comprehensive output formats
Pricing: Free
Key Features
- Unix seconds and milliseconds
- ISO 8601 (UTC and zoned)
- Full IANA timezone support
- Luxon-powered conversions
- Client-side only (no data storage)
- Duration calculator
- Date math calculator
- Keyboard shortcuts
Pros
- Comprehensive timezone database
- Multiple output formats
- Privacy-focused (client-side)
- Additional calculator tools
- Educational content library
Cons
- No API access
- No batch processing
- Requires internet connection
Limitations: Web-only (no API or CLI)
EpochConverter.com ★★★★☆
Best for: Quick conversions and code snippets
Pricing: Free (ad-supported)
Key Features
- Unix timestamp conversion
- Batch conversion
- Programming language snippets
- RFC 2822 formatting
- Countdown to dates
Pros
- Quick and simple interface
- Code examples in multiple languages
- Batch conversion support
- No registration required
Cons
- Limited timezone support
- Ad-heavy interface
- Dated UI design
- Limited output formats
Limitations: Basic timezone support, ads can be distracting
Unix-Timestamp.com ★★★☆☆
Best for: Minimal, quick conversions
Pricing: Free
Key Features
- Current timestamp display
- Timestamp to date conversion
- Date to timestamp conversion
- Countdown timers
Pros
- Simple and fast
- Clean interface
- No ads
- Mobile-friendly
Cons
- Limited features
- Basic timezone support
- No advanced formatting options
- No batch processing
Limitations: Very basic functionality, limited timezone options
CurrentMillis.com ★★★☆☆
Best for: JavaScript developers needing millisecond timestamps
Pricing: Free
Key Features
- Current timestamp in milliseconds
- Convert timestamp to date
- Code snippets for various languages
- Human-readable format conversion
Pros
- Focuses on millisecond precision
- Language-specific examples
- Fast loading
- Simple interface
Cons
- Limited features
- Basic timezone options
- No batch conversion
- Minimal documentation
Limitations: Limited customization, basic timezone handling
Libraries and APIs
Programming libraries for embedding timestamp functionality in your applications. These require coding but offer maximum flexibility and control.
DateTimeFormatter (Java) ★★★★★
Best for: Java applications requiring robust date-time handling
Pricing: Free (part of Java)
Key Features
- Pattern-based formatting
- Locale support
- Timezone awareness
- Parsing and formatting
- Predefined formats (ISO_INSTANT, RFC_1123, etc.)
Pros
- Industry standard for Java
- Comprehensive formatting options
- Thread-safe
- Part of standard library
Cons
- Java-specific
- Learning curve
- Verbose API
- Not a standalone tool
Limitations: Java-only, requires coding
Moment.js ★★★☆☆
Best for: Legacy JavaScript projects
Pricing: Free (open source)
Key Features
- Parse, validate, manipulate dates
- Timezone support (with moment-timezone)
- Duration calculations
- Relative time
- Multiple locales
Pros
- Mature ecosystem
- Extensive documentation
- Large community
- Rich feature set
Cons
- In maintenance mode (use Luxon/Day.js instead)
- Large bundle size
- Mutable API (error-prone)
- Performance issues
Limitations: Deprecated (maintenance mode), mutable API
Luxon ★★★★★
Best for: Modern JavaScript projects requiring timezone accuracy
Pricing: Free (open source)
Key Features
- Immutable date objects
- IANA timezone support
- Duration and interval arithmetic
- Locale-aware formatting
- Modern JavaScript API
Pros
- Modern immutable API
- Excellent timezone support
- Smaller than Moment.js
- Active development
- TypeScript support
Cons
- Smaller ecosystem than Moment
- Requires learning new API
- Bundle size larger than native Date
- Not as minimal as Day.js
Limitations: Requires JavaScript runtime
Day.js ★★★★☆
Best for: JavaScript projects prioritizing bundle size
Pricing: Free (open source)
Key Features
- Moment.js-compatible API
- Small bundle size (2KB)
- Plugin architecture
- Timezone support (via plugin)
- Immutable
Pros
- Extremely lightweight
- Moment.js compatible API
- Plugin system
- Good performance
Cons
- Requires plugins for advanced features
- Smaller community than Luxon
- Less comprehensive than Luxon
- Timezone plugin adds size
Limitations: Limited built-in features (requires plugins)
date-fns ★★★★☆
Best for: Projects using functional programming patterns
Pricing: Free (open source)
Key Features
- Functional programming approach
- Tree-shakeable
- Over 200 date functions
- Timezone support (via date-fns-tz)
- TypeScript support
Pros
- Modular and tree-shakeable
- Functional API
- Rich function library
- Active development
Cons
- Timezone support requires separate package
- Can be verbose
- Learning curve
- Different API than competitors
Limitations: Timezone support requires additional package
Python datetime ★★★★☆
Best for: Python applications and scripts
Pricing: Free (part of Python)
Key Features
- Native Python date/time handling
- Timezone support
- Date arithmetic
- Formatting and parsing
- ISO 8601 support
Pros
- Built into Python
- No external dependencies
- Well documented
- Widely used
Cons
- Limited timezone database
- Requires pytz for comprehensive support
- API inconsistencies
- Not as intuitive as some alternatives
Limitations: Python-only, limited timezone database without pytz
Temporal (JavaScript) ★★★★☆
Best for: Future JavaScript projects
Pricing: Free (future JavaScript standard)
Key Features
- Modern date/time API
- Immutable
- Timezone-aware
- Calendar system support
- Precise duration handling
Pros
- Future JavaScript standard
- Modern immutable API
- Comprehensive feature set
- Addresses Date object issues
Cons
- Not yet standard
- Requires polyfill
- Large polyfill size
- Still changing (Stage 3)
Limitations: Stage 3 proposal (not yet standard), requires polyfill
API Services
Cloud-based APIs for time synchronization and conversion. Ideal for server-side applications requiring accurate time from external sources.
World Time API ★★★★☆
Best for: Applications needing server time synchronization
Pricing: Free (no rate limits listed)
Key Features
- Current time by timezone
- Current time by IP
- Timezone list
- JSON response format
- Free tier available
Pros
- Simple REST API
- No authentication required
- Good documentation
- Multiple timezone formats
Cons
- External dependency
- Network latency
- No SLA on free tier
- Limited features beyond current time
Limitations: Requires internet connection, external dependency
TimeAPI.io ★★★★☆
Best for: Production applications requiring time API
Pricing: Free tier: 100 requests/day, Paid: from $9/month
Key Features
- Current time by timezone
- Time conversion
- Time calculations
- Business days calculations
- API for developers
Pros
- Comprehensive API
- Business day calculations
- Good documentation
- Reliable SLA on paid tiers
Cons
- Costs money for production use
- Rate limits
- External dependency
- Requires API key management
Limitations: Rate limits on free tier, costs for high volume
Command-Line Tools
Terminal-based utilities for shell scripts and automation. Essential for DevOps workflows and batch processing.
date (Unix CLI) ★★★★☆
Best for: Shell scripts and automation
Pricing: Free (part of Unix/Linux)
Key Features
- Display/set system date
- Format timestamps
- Convert between formats
- Timezone conversion
- Calculate dates
Pros
- Available everywhere
- Powerful formatting
- Shell integration
- No dependencies
Cons
- Complex syntax
- Platform differences (GNU vs BSD)
- Not beginner-friendly
- Limited interactive features
Limitations: Command-line only, syntax can be cryptic
strftime.org ★★★★☆
Best for: Learning strftime format codes
Pricing: Free
Key Features
- strftime format reference
- Interactive format tester
- Language-specific examples
- Quick reference table
Pros
- Excellent reference
- Interactive testing
- Multiple languages
- Clean design
Cons
- Not a conversion tool
- Limited to strftime format
- No timezone handling
- No actual date conversion
Limitations: Reference only, not a conversion tool
Use Case Recommendations
Not sure which tool to choose? Here are recommendations based on common use cases.
Quick one-off conversions
Recommended: Timestamp Generator or EpochConverter.com
Why: Web-based tools are fastest for occasional use without installation
Production JavaScript application
Recommended: Luxon or date-fns
Why: Modern, well-maintained libraries with excellent timezone support
Bundle size critical project
Recommended: Day.js or native Date
Why: Day.js is only 2KB, native Date has zero overhead
Server-side time synchronization
Recommended: World Time API or TimeAPI.io
Why: Reliable external time sources prevent drift
Shell scripts and automation
Recommended: date (Unix CLI)
Why: Built-in tool with powerful formatting options
Java enterprise application
Recommended: java.time (DateTimeFormatter)
Why: Standard library, thread-safe, comprehensive
Python data pipelines
Recommended: datetime + pytz or Arrow
Why: Native integration with Python ecosystem
Learning timestamp concepts
Recommended: Timestamp Generator + educational content
Why: Comprehensive guides and interactive tool for hands-on learning
How to Choose the Right Tool
Consider Your Requirements
- Frequency of Use
- Occasional: Web-based tools (Timestamp Generator, EpochConverter)
- Daily: CLI tools or libraries
- Programmatic: Libraries and APIs
- Timezone Requirements
- Basic UTC conversion: Any tool works
- Multiple timezones: Timestamp Generator, Luxon, date-fns
- Historical accuracy: Luxon, java.time
- Privacy Concerns
- Sensitive data: Client-side only tools (Timestamp Generator, libraries)
- No concerns: API services acceptable
- Performance
- Bundle size critical: Day.js, native Date
- Speed critical: Native libraries (java.time, datetime)
- Accuracy critical: Luxon, NTP-synced APIs
- Integration
- Existing codebase: Match language/framework
- New project: Modern libraries (Luxon, date-fns)
- Standalone tool: Web tools or CLI
Decision Tree
┌─ Need a library/API? │ ├─ Yes │ │ ├─ JavaScript? │ │ │ ├─ Bundle size critical? → Day.js │ │ │ ├─ Best timezone support? → Luxon │ │ │ └─ Functional style? → date-fns │ │ ├─ Java? → java.time (DateTimeFormatter) │ │ ├─ Python? → datetime + pytz │ │ └─ Other? → Check language-specific libraries page │ └─ No (one-off conversion) │ ├─ Need privacy? → Timestamp Generator (client-side) │ ├─ Need batch? → EpochConverter.com │ └─ In terminal? → date (Unix CLI)
Additional Resources
- Timezone API Comparison - Compare major timezone and timestamp APIs
- Best Date-Time Libraries by Language - Organized library recommendations for every major programming language
- Complete Guide to Unix Timestamps - Deep dive into Unix time fundamentals
- Timezone Conversion Best Practices - Avoid common timezone mistakes
- JavaScript Date-Time Guide - Working with dates in JavaScript
- Try Timestamp Generator - Free, privacy-focused timestamp conversion tool
Help Improve This List
Know a great timestamp tool we missed? Found an error in our comparison? We welcome feedback to keep this resource accurate and comprehensive.